On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 09:46:41 -0400
HaywireMac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> 
> Hey y'all, kinda OT, but WTF, it's a simple (I hope) question.
> 
> I wanted to see if I could put one of them purty W3C validation tags on
> my site, but when I go to their site, it says that "<" is an invalid tag
> enclosure. WTF am I supposed to use?!

No, it's probably something in there somewhere, enclosed in the tags. There is a
pointer thingy showing where the error normally is, however this totally depends
on your used fonts and so on, else it's rendered incorrectly and it appears that
the bog is something else. < > are standard in html / php / xml, so that cannot
be the reason. Maybe posting the chunk of code around the error region to this
list would help you more?


> I followed the conventions according to the W3C tutorials and such, but
> they don't seem to like my version of < maybe? Is the a new version of
> <, LOL!

LOL ;-) As I said, < > are standard... no ways of making a page without it ;-)


Greetings
Ralph
--
http://axljab.homelinux.org/
"...the software said Win95 or better, so I installed Linux"

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to