On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 15:53:41 +0900 Lance Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Okay, before I go out and smell the dioxins, there is one item of > urgent (for me, anyway) business: > > Please look at the following URL in both Mozilla and Konqueror: > > https://newtrading.etrade.ne.jp/ETGate > > I know you probably can't read Japanese (most of you anyway). > It's okay. <g> > > You will probably notice a difference between Mozilla and > Konqueror right away on this page: The Mozilla implementation > seems complete; some things are clearly missing in Konqueror. > However, the Konqueror page seems much more readable (what there > is of it) -- fonts sharper, whatever (I set my fonts larger in > Konqueror, which helps dramatically, but doesn't seem to help in > Mozilla). > > I hate to say it . . . but using the dreaded "Browser from > Redmond" in the dreaded "OS from Redmond", this page loads > beautifully, perfectly, splendidly. (William is watching over > me?) > > Advice and counsel sought, providing I survive the dioxins, that > is. > > Lance > > > There are some tags that mozilla and opera don't render properly either. I noticed last week when I was working on a table that a friend gave me for inclusion on the webpage that neither of these browsers rendered the column background colors at all. IE and Konq both handle it well. http://americanelevatorinspection.com/InspectorsOnly/FlaCodeTracking1.html There is also a flaw in the code on our homepage with the registration that I can't find. Again Konq and IE see it right, moz and opera don't. I asked an old old webpage guru (now age 19). He said it has always been thus. Lee -- User #223705 Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
