On Saturday 10 Jan 2004 3:16 pm, Anne Wilson wrote: > On Saturday 10 January 2004 14:44, Richard Urwin wrote: > > If I can get SpamAssassin in it is more > > powerful. > > I have to question that. I know it's better known, but I get far > better rates under POPFile than I did when I tried SA. POPFile > functions typically at 99.87% accuracy. I don't think you can better > that.
That's a very impressive number, but I don't see what POPFile does that SA doesn't. You do need to train SA, and it doesn't start using Bayesian analysis until it's database has 200 messages in. I don't have any experience of how easy, hard or accurate this bit of SA is. I run it at work, but the setup precludes training the Bayesian bit. -- Richard Urwin
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
