On Monday 26 January 2004 06:31 pm, Paul wrote: > The reasons for the case not being heard was: > > 1. IBM asked for more time (SCO) > 2. mutually agreed (SCOs second response), or > 3. SCO asked for more time (IBM)
I suspect that the truth is that both asked for more time, SCO because it has already admittedly failed to comply totally with the motion to compel and IBM because they are still busy going through the responses to point out to the Judge where the answers are still incomplete. -- Bryan Phinney Software Test Engineer
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
