On Wed, 11 Feb 2004 16:45:46 +0000 Olivier Esser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello, > > Spamassassin is installed in the central server where I receive mail. > I have not installed it locally. Almost no spam are caught anymore; > all spams seems to have understand the trick and to hide somehow the > significant word (writing v.ia.gr@ for example). Has anyone > experienced this problem? Are the most recent versions of spamassissin > better? > > Olivier Esser Hello Olivier, Strange that you should mention this today .. as I have exactly the same problem. BUT, I found a better solution, which so far today has caught 18/18 spams received today! Spamassasin stopped working for me too beginning of this year, when the majority of my spam was a combination of random words. Seems from what I read somewhere that spamassasin has big issues differentiating these mails from normal ones. http://sourceforge.net/projects/bmf/ You have to "train" it too actually, and I was fully set up within 30 minutes, which included the installation, and reading the readme. If you try it though, there is an error in the README's procmail entry though, and it should read: ### begin sample two ### # Invoke bmf as a filter :0 fw | bmf -p # Filter spam :0: * ^X-Spam-Status: Yes $MAILDIR/spam That is with a * before "^X-Spam-Status: Yes" So far, with only 1 day's testing though it's been 100% accurate which is great. If you need more info, please just ask. Greetings Ralph -- http://axljab.homelinux.org/
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
