On Sunday 15 February 2004 10:20 am, Glenn wrote:
> On Saturday 14 February 2004 16:17, Dennis Myers wrote:
> > On Saturday 14 February 2004 04:51 pm, Glenn wrote:
> > > On Saturday 14 February 2004 21:30, you wrote:
> > > > No I havent tried because while I know mandrake was likely derived
> > > > from RH. RH-7.2 �is several years old and will not install on this
> > > > equipment. Therefore I am skittish, for that reason. �As a matter of
> > > > fact I couldnt get it to work on a 586, �but the screensaver was
> > > > great. I guess if I cant find out how to get the files I need for the
> > > > other one I'll have to try.
> > > >
> > > > Regards;
> > > > Hoyt
> > >
> > > I've got 20 different screen savers listed in my 10.0rc2 configuration
> > > without having to take any special steps.  Maybe I missed something way
> > > early in this thread, but where are the KDE packages falling short?  I
> > > can't remember exactly which package(s) contained all of these savers,
> > > but "KDE" and "art" were in the name, IIRC.
> > >
> > > I've even got a slide show saver cycling through a series of Rocky
> > > Mountains shots I took last year.  Something soothing about that.
> > >
> > > Glenn
> >
> > Wait, did I miss something? Did you say 10.0rc2 and mean 10.0beta2? or
> > did I miss where 10.0rc1 was released?
>
> Boy, I feel like a bonehead.  Of course I meant beta2.  Must be the cold
> drugs talking.  Oops.
>
> Glenn
Whew! I thought I had made a major miss there. Schedule shows that rc1 was 
supposed to be out last friday but nothing showing yet. Warly schedule says 
he has test .isos done, so we should see bittorrent very very soon.  The fun 
just keeps on going. : )
-- 
Dennis M. linux user #180842


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Reply via email to