Alex V Flinsch wrote:
>
> On Sun, 31 Oct 1999, you wrote:
>
> >
> > > Found Macronix 98715 PMAC at I/O 0xe400.
> > > tulip.c:v0.89H 5/23/98 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > eth0: Macronix 98715 PMAC at 0xe400, 00 80 c6 f8 94 97, IRQ 11.
> >
> > Could you post the output of 'ifconfig eth0' and 'route -n'?
> >
> Here it is:
> [root@localhost alex]# ifconfig eth0
> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:80:C6:F8:94:97
> inet addr:192.168.1.2 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
> Interrupt:11 Base address:0xe400
>
> [root@localhost alex]# route -n
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
> 192.168.1.2 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 eth0
> 206.115.158.168 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 ppp0
> 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
> 127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo
> 0.0.0.0 206.115.158.168 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 ppp0
>
> Would I be correct in thinking that the 192.168.1.0 in the above
> destinations should be something else (line 192.168.1.1 ?) or am I completely
> off base?
No, that line is correct. It says that for any address in 192.168.1.X,
use the ethernet interface.
All of the interfaces and routing looks correct. Could you try one more
thing?
On a linux terminal, start a 'ping 192.168.1.2'. Then switch terminals
and run
tcpdump -i eth0 | tee tcpdump-output
Then mail a good portion of the tcpdump-output file to the list.
One other thing, I seem to remember seeing something in your original
log messages about the card being put into 100Tx mode. Is the Windows
side also 100Mb?
--
Steve Philp
Network Administrator
Advance Packaging Corporation
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
