you left my mouth wide shut :)
-------------------------------- force, my friend, is violence! hugenots [EMAIL PROTECTED] SK> On Wed, 2004-04-07 at 18:24, hugenots wrote: >> Haiz newbie, >> >> I know this is unplesant question, bt is there any way for linux >> users work with microsoft mail... >> >> and is there something like M$ mail under linux? >> >> -------------------------------- >> force, my friend, is violence! >> hugenots [EMAIL PROTECTED] SK> 1.) UNIX based mail and FIDO based mail came before M$ "types" of mail. SK> M$ types of mail are proprietary and generally not well written bits of SK> software. SK> 2.) RESEARCH. Google is your friend. In linux you have Evolution, Balsa, SK> Sylpheed, Kmail and several other mail packages NOT including the ever SK> popular Mozilla Mail and Netscape Mail. Have you bothered to look at SK> your system? You SHOULD have at leat four different packages that come SK> default with your installation without making any choices. RTFM. SK> 3.) Evolution is better than Outlook (otherwise known as LOOKOUT) and SK> Outlook Express (otherwise know and LOOKOUT NOW); dig into your system SK> and RTFM. SK> 4.) You have the ability with a normal installation to have IMAP and SK> POP3 by default; if you want M$ style IMAP ability, install the packages SK> and they work right off the bat. RTFM. SK> Linux/*NIX are the original "mail handlers" from more than 30 years SK> past. You also have PINE, MUTT and MAIL available from the command SK> line... SK> How long have you been using linux now? SK> stephen kuhn - owner SK> ============================== SK> illawarra computer services SK> a kuhn media australia company SK> http://kma.0catch.com SK> ------------------------------------------------------------------ SK> * This message was composed on a 100% Microsoft free computer * SK> We expressly refuse to utilise Microsoft DRM encoded documents SK> ------------------------------------------------------------------ SK> Everyone knows that dragons don't exist. But while this simplistic SK> formulation may satisfy the layman, it does not suffice for the SK> scientific mind. The School of Higher Neantical Nillity is in fact SK> wholly unconcerned with what ____does exist. Indeed, the banality of SK> existence has been so amply demonstrated, there is no need for us to SK> discuss it any further here. The brilliant Cerebron, attacking the SK> problem analytically, discovered three distinct kinds of dragon: the SK> mythical, the chimerical, and the purely hypothetical. They were all, SK> one might say, nonexistent, but each nonexisted in an entirely different SK> way ... -- Stanislaw Lem, "Cyberiad"
____________________________________________________ Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com ____________________________________________________
