On Thursday 24 June 2004 05:49 pm, Amy wrote: > You know, I could get offended that you're implying I'm stupid because > you assume I haven't been reading the posting. Just because I didn't > send off a post right away when I read the first message in the thread > doesn't mean I didn't read that one before all the other posting > happened on the list. > > I has assumed that maybe I'd done something wrong, because I had thought > that this list was safe and friendly and therefore I didn't have to > watch out for underhanded idiots who'd drop links that aren't what they > say they are. > > I suppose that makes me the idiot to try to make sure I hadn't done > something stupid before crying foul on someone who's posted to a list > I'd otherwise gotten a good impression of? And it makes me an idiot > because I couldn't read the messages that hadn't been posted yet at the > time I read the first message?
OK, I do apologize... I was the one that didn't fully read your post (and understand it). In the mad rush of things, I had thought you were responding to my post, so I was totally in the wrong. I will slow down next time and try to read what's going on, instead of rushing through the posts and trying to do 10 things at once. -- Take care, Randall Hobbs Programmer - System Administrator - Chip Castle Dot Com, Inc. Web Hosting * Programming * Software http://www.chipcastle.com
____________________________________________________ Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com ____________________________________________________
