Hello,

I hate to reply to this.
I would be concerned of my data security if I'd have
been NASA. But I'm not. If you want to erase some
data, try a wipe!
I'm sad to see somebody confusing open source (== open
minded) to illegal activities. I've never imagined 
somebody so fly... Being m$ competitive/alternative
doesn't mean to be illegal.
Was that a math lesson? Do you think some
multiplications means Maths? It meant 20000 years ago,
maybe.
Try some physics: L=mc2.
Take an ice-tea and relax! And avoid coffeine! Your
lesson for this life is patience + wisdom. You need a
lot, Tomas.
It is a wonder that somebody (i.e. Mr. Charlie Mahan)
bothered to answer you...

Mike,
Owner of Diploma in Mathematics and Computer Science
+ pretty experienced developer on M$Windows
+ owner of 7 Brainbench diplomas.


--- Charlie Mahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On August 5, 2004 00:31:12, Tomas Tudja wrote:
> > Hello,
> > Format, fill with big files (movies) until there
> will be no space left
> > and format again. If electron microscope guys
> (probably there are much
> > cheaper ways to read data from disk only twice
> formatted) will find
> > anything, it will be only data from last copyed
> files. If electron guys
> > are working for RIAA, you are in trouble because
> of illegal copyes of
> > movies :>. But you need a working system to do it.
> There is no other way
> > to properly and safely clean the disk without
> damage.
> 
> Define working system before you make such
> statements please. Booting from one 
> of the many LiveCD disks available and using the
> tools available to mount, 
> format, change fs type and format again is possible
> and easy. The drives can 
> have previous data on them or not. It makes no
> difference.
> 
> You have taken this _way_ farther than anyone needed
> for it to go. My 
> *flippant* comments about electron microscopes were
> to illustrate that the 
> original question wasn't specifically asking for a
> format that would make any 
> data impossible to read because that is a difficult
> process and very 
> expensive. I was trying to steer the original poster
> away from the "low level 
> format" trap since it tends to damage old drives of
> unknown pedigree 
> sometimes.
> 
> The first point I made in my reply was that it's
> probably easier to use the 
> original manufacturers tools to do the job, then I
> threw in some smart ass 
> comments.
> 
> > Little math lesson:
> > Let say there is an "empty place" on a disk.
> That's the place, where we
> > write the bite we want to be there. We have a 20G
> disk. There are
> > 171798691840 "empty places"
> > (   (((20 * 1024) * 1024) * 1024) * 8 =
> 171798691840   ). If we write a
> > file on disk, we can do it by 5MBps. That means we
> can fill 41943040
> > "empty places" in 1 second. If we format a 20G
> partition with HardDrake,
> > it takes about 20 seconds (I don't remember the
> correct time). So, if we
> > format a disk (partition placed on entire disk),
> we are touching only
> > 838860800 "empty places" on the disk and
> 170959831040 are untouched and
> > containing old data. If we make two different
> formats (difrent
> > filesystems), we just decrease this number maybe
> by another 838860800
> > and that is not enough. IT IS NEED TO TOUCH EVERY
> SINGLE BITE ON A DISK
> > TO BE SURE THERE IS NOTHING LEFT!!! Touching all
> bites on 20G disk takes
> > about 68 minutes by speed 5 MBps.
> 
> What's the point? I openly stated that guarding
> against that type of forensic 
> analysis was not going to be accomplished by what I
> was recommending. Are you 
> trying to prove you are more capable and more
> intelligent than I?
> 
> Fine you win. Much of the world fits that
> description.
> 
> > Counts are only guesses (I really have no glue
> about writing speed on a
> > disk, but I thing it is something about 5 MBps. I
> guess there are really
> > only 60 seconds in each minute and only 1024 bytes
> in every single MB
> 
> If I wanted to study math I'd enrol in University,
> wouldn't I? I don't have 
> the time. Your points are made and that's fine, but
> there was no reason for 
> them in my opinion, and this type of over technical
> extremism may be why so 
> many people despise "geeks."
> 
> Is there a reason that you felt a need to
> demonstrate your intellectual 
> prowess? 
> 
> Does anyone care?
> 
> > Sorry for bugging you, but it is very simple so I
> wonder, why is
> > everybody not understanding it with me. :>
> >
> > Tomas Tudja
> > 136 Church Road
> > N17 8AJ
> > London, UK
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://hysteria.sk/catcher
> 
> What makes you think nobody understands these things
> but you? Or cares if you 
> do? Or if I do? Who in the world cares if the data
> is unrecoverable with 
> specialized tools, or through more drastic measures?
> 
> I offered a choice of methods to accomplish the
> original poster's question. 
> What did you offer? "Write movies to the disk!" You
> do know that many 
> countries legal systems consider that an illegal
> activity, do you not? It's 
> called illegal copying or piracy and worse. But your
> remarks about the 
> R.I.A.Ass. prove that you do. I won't recommend
> illegal activity.
> 
> Does using Outlook on Windows make you somebody
> special?
> 
> I needed not to read your belittling B.S. on a list
> where I and many others 
> volunteer our time attempting to help others. I
> definitely didn't need a 
> primer course in kitchen arithmetic. With _absolute
> certainty_ I can 
> unequivocally state that I didn't need some lurker
> popping in to tell me in a 
> backhand (or direct either) way that I am a mental
> midget and less than the 
> dust beneath his training wheels.
> 
> To the rest of the list members; my humble apology
> for the diatribe.
> 
> To Thomas Tudja; if I want your opinion I'll damned
> well give it to you first.
> 
> You'd probably still screw it up though.
> 
> Regards;
> Charlie
> Let the "zings" begin.
> - -- 
> Edmonton,AB,Canada User #244963 at
> http://counter.li.org
> Mandrakelinux release 10.1 (Beta 1) for i586 kernel
> 2.6.8-0.rc2.2mdk
> 01:53:54 up 6:33, 1 user, load average: 0.35, 0.30,
> 0.27
> I have many CHARTS and DIAGRAMS..
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
> 
>
iD8DBQFBEe/xZqvqlrLPr5YRAgQRAJ9XoDLRWe6RqbUqR68mQgH0+TlDaACeMF/v
> wnsE8FGoso7NCEslAVMTHpk=
> =0gwA
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> >
____________________________________________________
> Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
> 
> Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
> Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com
> ____________________________________________________
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

____________________________________________________
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com
____________________________________________________

Reply via email to