Then I suppose it's time to bug the gmail team. Very weird though, considering it's let me select a blank field for the replyto address. Oh well, I'll bug them about it now. Thanks for checking for me though. ^_^
On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 16:46:40 -0400, et <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Saturday 30 October 2004 16:43, Amy wrote: > > Hey everyone! > > > > I've noticed a lot of people have been complaining about the reply-to > > address issue with gmail. I think I've fixed it on mine. If gmail > > users go into settings, there are two options for the reply-to, their > > gmail address, and a blank field which one is expected to put > > something in. Well, gmail seems to have accepted me selecting the > > field without filling it in with anything... if anyone would like to > > confirm this works correctly (try replying to my message here), we can > > find out if this is indeed the correct solution to the problem and > > start sharing it with other gmail users on the list. ^_^ > > > > Hope this helps! > > > > Amy > not fixed, still goes to Amy > -- > linux counter #167806 > -- ~~ >^..^< ~~ http://deathkitten.net ~~ >^..^< ~~ "Words are, of course, the most powerful drug used by mankind." ~Rudyard Kipling
____________________________________________________ Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com ____________________________________________________
