John Layt wrote:
Yeah maybe you are right, but this Mandrake 10.1 really put me into trouble. One time even my system was rendered into totally hanging situation when I selected all packages to be installed, just after installation !!! Also, our testing server could work good (not great) with FC3 but when I installed Mandrake 10.1 just to test, it just crashed and we had only problem. Of course I just wanted to test it to see if it is a good replace to FC3, but as I said Mandrake is more user friendly, but it is totally unstable. I mean Mandrake Community 10.1, at least on my system. It always crashes and many features doesn't work properly such as updating which is critical. I could not install all packages you select to install and I had to select it one by one which wasted my time. I tried to install it on a PIII 933 MHz with 192 MB RAM and 30 GB harddisk. This is not a our server and it is just an old system to test. Anyway, my questions are:On Wed, 8 Dec 2004 03:44, Danesh Daroui wrote:Hi, 1. Is Mandrake 10.1 Official more stable than Community ? What about Mandrake 10.0 ? 2. I tried to download Mandrake 10.1 Official from Mandrakesoft web site, but the it just forced to be a member in Mandrakeclub which costs. I have no problem to pay, but as I know Mandrakesoft used to strongly encourage users to be member not forced !!! Also, as it says, every year membership should be re-newed. Am I right ? If it is, why there are some unofficial sites which allows people to download ? 3. Our server will be a Web-Server (Apache), Print and Database (MySQL) server with almost 150-250 hits per day and heavy traffic for print and Database manipulation on a high model system of course. Do you think mandrake can handle it or not ? FC3 could. Again sorry for misunderstanding. I didn't mean it. Regards, Danesh Daroui |
- Re: [newbie] Mandrake 10.1 Danesh Daroui
- Re: [newbie] Mandrake 10.1 Wojciech Podgórni
- Re: [newbie] Mandrake 10.1 Fajar Priyanto
- Re: [newbie] Mandrake 10.1 Duncan Anderson
