On Sunday 02 January 2005 05:15 pm, JoeHill wrote:
> There's so many factors involved, tho, if you look at Randall's stats his
> OO opens in the same amount of time as mine, and he's got a freakin'
> monster. Could be the OO version, could be a lot of things. *But*, with RAM
> bein' so stinkin' cheap, why the hell not, eh?
Hehe, actually this machine is somewhat weak compared to the ones I get to
play with at work. We've got a couple of dual 2.8GHz Xeon's with 2 gigs of
ram on'em (dual channel DDR 400), and they're about the same. I think it's
mostly due to the fact that OO is just a BIG program, and requires more than
a couple of seconds to start.
This machine I built has been mostly optimized for file serving anyway. It's
got ample storage space available, though I'm about ready to go buy a few
more drives for it:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mandrake]$ df
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part5
30G 6.9G 21G 25% /
/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part1
2.0G 36M 1.9G 2% /boot
/dev/md/0 294G 246G 33G 89% /home
/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part7
20G 5.9G 13G 32% /usr
/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part8
19G 422M 17G 3% /var
I'm thinking it's about time to build one of those dual Xeon systems for my
home PC... Might be nice to play with ;-)
--
Take care,
Randall Hobbs
Programmer - System Administrator - Acquire Technology, LLC
Web Hosting * Programming * Software
http://www.acquire-technology.com
____________________________________________________
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com
____________________________________________________
