On Tuesday 01 March 2005 17:09, Nigel Wilkinson wrote: > --On Tuesday, March 01, 2005 22:53:34 +0000 Nigel Wilkinson > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --On Monday, February 28, 2005 16:30:51 -0600 John Michael Schneiderman > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I have created a gpg key, but sometimes when I see one of my E-mails in > >> a post, it says that my signature wasn't valid. I have posted my keys > >> on-line. -- > > > > I've also noticed this. gpg says that the email in my sent box has a > > valid signature but the copy I get via the mailing list has an invalid > > sig whereas if I just mail myself its OK. I've wondered if this has > > something to do with the address displayed in the "From/To" column in the > > email client. If I mail myself this column has my email address and the > > sig is good whereas if I get one of my posts via the mailing list the > > "From/To" column has "[email protected]" and a bad sig. This > > could be a red herring but is the only pattern I see. Where does gpg get > > the email address to look up the sig for from? > > Damn, just posted a message to expert and it said the sig was good. That > blows that theory or is it something to do with newbie? > > Cheers > Nigel It's not just the newbie list, it also happens to me on the expert one as well. Strange. John
-- "Injustice is happening now; suffering is happening now. We have choices to make now. To insist on absolute certainty before starting to apply ethics to life decisions is a way of choosing to be amoral." Richard Stallman (Slashdot interview 1 May 2000)
pgplwRW7bIaRI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
