Elizabeth/michael....just a guess, but did you use lnx4win to install Linux? If so, then a "real" installation (where Linux has it's own partitions on the hard drive) of Linux will greatly speed up the system performance. On the other hand if my guess was wrong, here's another guess. Do you possibly have services running that you are not using. These extra services can take up resources unnecessarily and slow things down as well. This could apply even if my first guess was correct. Alan Elizabeth Dolan wrote: > > i have mandrake 6.1 and i have win98se. > i use win98se quite alot and i found that it is much faster then linux > is that meant to be the case?? > the kernel installed is 2.2.13.22mdk > > michael dolan
- [newbie] is linux meant to be slow?? Elizabeth Dolan
- Re: [newbie] is linux meant to be slow?? Hugh Semmler
- Re: [newbie] is linux meant to be slow?? Josh McCaffrey
- Re: [newbie] is linux meant to be slow?? Seth Gibson
- Re: [newbie] is linux meant to be slow?? Josh McCaffrey
- Re: [newbie] is linux meant to be sl... Mike Fieschko
- Re: [newbie] is linux meant to b... Josh McCaffrey
- Re: [newbie] is linux meant ... Mike Fieschko
- Re: [newbie] is linux meant to be slow?? Mark Fitzgerald
- Re: [newbie] is linux meant to be slow?? Alan Shoemaker
- Re: [newbie] is linux meant to be slow?? Morris Walton
- Re: [newbie] is linux meant to be slow?? Morris Walton
- Re: [newbie] is linux meant to be slow?? Mark Fitzgerald
- Re: [newbie] is linux meant to be slow?? John
- Re: [newbie] is linux meant to be slow?? JAMIL HUSSAIN
- Re: [newbie] is linux meant to be slow?? Josh McCaffrey
- RE: [newbie] is linux meant to be slow?? Warren Rowe
- RE: [newbie] is linux meant to be slow?? Warren Rowe
