why not scan a picture and use and converty to ansi text the picture dosn't
have to contain anything it shouldn't but it would make the point.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: flupke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 09 May 2000 10:43
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [newbie] watch what you say on this list
>
>
> Well, I also had the same problem while answering to someone
> stating that
> a program told him that "his kernel was an asshole" or something like
> that.
> I really don't apprciate this kind of mail sniffing. I find that
> outrageous.
> I sent them a mail, asking for explaination, who they were to
> afford to
> watch my mail, saying that couldn't let a robot judge the
> content of an
> email, etc...
> Of course, I didn't receive any answer. I really think we should do
> something against those people. I don't know what, but we have to find
> something. Thinking about those guyz makes me sick!
> Maybe adding a word like "porn", or "asshole" or something
> like that in
> *EVERY* mail sent to the list would annoy them enough. Or if everyone
> could send them a mail to ask for explaination would convice
> these guyz to
> leave us alone and let the ineternet be a place of freedom.
> Maybe others will have better suggestions.
>
> I usually don't smile about other's problems, but I'm kind of
> glad that
> this didn't happen only to me.
>
> Flupke
>
> On Mon, 8 May 2000, WolfRyder wrote:
>
> > Following is a copy of an email I am sending to the
> "filtering" site that
> > linux-mandrake uses. This is in reference to the email thread about
> > "Parental Control".
> >
> > I received an email just now saying my email was "
> inappropriate subject
> > matter ". It was logged by you. I don't understand why,
> though. I was
> > answering an email on a listserv of which I am a member and we were
> > discussing filtering software for Linux as opposed to
> parental monitoring.
> >
> > I don't understand why I was singled out for this type of
> monitoring when
> > the other people the list used the same word as I, but were
> not censured
> > (as far as I know).
> >
> > You can bet I won't be discussing the merits of software
> filtering on that
> > list again. If they use this service to strike fear in the
> hearts of it's
> > participants when discussing possible writing of filtering
> options, it's
> > not a site I wish to respond to at all.
> >
> > I am therefore unsubscribing right now.
> > Carol
> >
> >
> > >MIMEsweeper ChineseWall
> > >Server: CN=NS005/OU=DSRV/O=Texas Utilities
> >
> ->------------------------------------------------------------
> --------------
> > ---------------------------------------------
> > >Mail-Info
> >
> > >From: WolfRyder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> @ TU
> > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >Date: 05/08/2000 07:42:46 AM
> > >Subject: Re: [newbie] Parental Control
> >
> >-------------------------------------------------------------
> -------------
> > ----------------------------------------------
> > >'ChineseWall Job' reports:
> >
> > >TXU automatically screens all e-mail for inappropriate
> subject matter (i.e.
> > >material that is discriminatory, hateful, vulgar, pornographic,
> > >sexually-explicit, or obscene). This e-mail contains
> information that is
> > >considered inappropriate for the business environment and
> has been logged and
> > >will be reviewed to determine final disposition. If you
> have any questions,
> > >please direct them to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > ' porn ' found!
> >
> > >Mail has been archived!
> >
> >
>
