But PGP encryption is NEEDED in a *_= public =_* mail list? Let me see that adds an extra 1K to every message you send here, and those L O N G sig files are really nessessary (read with sarcasm intended) also...that add to the overall message lenght also. Yet no one seems to mind that, you people just harp on HTML, and MS attachments, or the MS O/S. This IS a Linux mail list, not a bash MS list with a Linux problem mentioned almost as an after thought. IMO Jaguar Please send flames to /dev/null Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --------------------------------------------- > Attachment:� > MIME Type:�multipart/signed > --------------------------------------------- > On Fri, Jul 14, 2000 at 09:51:54PM -0500, John Glasscock wrote: > > I, for one, find that with HTML one can be more expressive and > > informative in conveying important information. I also believe that > > I don't think so. You can express all that you need in just plain ASCII, > there's no need for *bold* or _italics_ text. And the advantages of HTML > work only right on the web with all its pictures and such. In mail it > simply wastes bandwith and distracts from the most important thing of your > mail, the message. > > Besides, HTML capable mail readers are so uncomfortable to use, or at least > the HTML MUAs that I know. But that's of course only a personal opinion. > > Alexander Skwar > -- > Homepage: http://www.digitalprojects.com > Sichere Mail? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] fuer GnuPG Keys > ICQ: 7328191 > --------------------------------------------- > Attachment:�application/pgp-signature > MIME Type:�application/pgp-signature > --------------------------------------------- The Dogma chased the Stigma, and was hit by the Karma. ____________________________________________________________________ Get your own FREE, personal Netscape WebMail account today at http://webmail.netscape.com.
