I guess we're all expecting this to be addressed in newer kernel this
Fall.
At least, that's what I've been reading...
Roman
Steve Howes wrote:
>
> Tom Brinkman wrote:
> > Keep in mind that the only reason you needed to append a mem
> > statement in the first place is because of a hardware deficiency.
> >
>
> I thought the reason for appending the 'mem=' was because the Linux
> kernal doesn't recognise more than 64Mb?
>
> --
> Steve - Cheltenham, UK
> ---------
> In love and light we are
> In darkness we are no less