heheh and I thought ALL you ladies were ONLY interested in size...:)

Philomena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> would you just drop it !!!! or take it offline
> This has nothing to do with Mandrake Linux and is getting very old !
> The size of a message wouldn't matter if we didn't have to wade through so 
> much off topic nonsense.
> 
> philomena
> 
> At 06:32 PM 7/19/00 +0200, you wrote:
> >On Mon, Jul 17, 2000 at 04:37:06PM -0700, Mike & Tracy Holt wrote:
> > > I'm sorry Alexander, but there's no way that 3 lines of text from an
email
> > > would produce 26 lines if written in html - it just doesn't work like
that.
> >
> >No?  You're sure?  If so, have a look at this message:
> >
> >Message-Id:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >From: "Phil Lamey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 15:26:16 -0400
> >Subject: unsubscribe
> >
> >It simply contains the word "unsubscribe" and is 30 lines long! And if you
> >only compare the line numbers of HTML vs. plain text, it is 14:1.  And
> >bytewise it is 309 bytes for the HTML junk vs. 12 bytes for plain text.
> >That's a ratio of 25.75:1.  And because he wrote the message as HTML +
plain
> >text, the ratio is even worse for html! >27:1.  Don't know how much
greater,
> >because sending an attachment will add some header and delimeter lines,
that
> >were not present if he would've only sent the mail in plain text.
> >
> >It just doesn't work like this?  I don't think so!  THAT is the way it
> >works!
> >
> >Alexander Skwar
> >--
> >Homepage:       http://www.digitalprojects.com
> >Sichere Mail?   Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] fuer GnuPG Keys
> >ICQ:            7328191


The Dogma chased the Stigma, and was hit by the Karma.

____________________________________________________________________
Get your own FREE, personal Netscape WebMail account today at 
http://webmail.netscape.com.

Reply via email to