You sound pretty passionate about your point...and it looks pretty solid as
well.

PLEASE DON'T FLAME THIS THREAD...

Thanks for not setting me a-blaze too!

Slowly yours,
Steve Weltman
(not able to overclock, cuz I dunno how!)
----- Original Message -----
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2000 8:26 AM
Subject: RE: [[newbie] Athlon thunderbird & ka7-100]


> NO, that is incorrect.  That statement is a myth promoted through
ignorance.
>
> I've seen enough destroyed product from overclockers - that I can stand
> straight and tall and tell you bluntly - overclocking DESTROYS parts.
> Period.
>
> "If you buy it - then it is yours" - is a defense statement that I hear
over
> and over again as to the excuse to try overclocking.  Once the part is
> destroyed - the mantra becomes - "It's under warranty - I want it replaced
> yesterday"
>
> BS - if you destroy it through misuse then it's yours.  Period.
>
> Learn the facts - and not the hype.  Overclocking destroys the forbidden
> gap.  It destroys the electron flow.  Overclockers just don't know what
they
> are doing - meanwhile - they promote themselves as if they know about
> electronics.  Overclocking is stupid.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Abe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2000 7:41 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [[newbie] Athlon thunderbird & ka7-100]
>
>
> yep and that is also why people can overclock their RAM & CPU's without
out
> right destroying them.  The hard ware tends to be rated conservatively
> because
> it will last longer if it is used at less then 100% of capacity.
>
>
>
>
>
> >===== Original Message From "John A. MacLaughlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> =====
> >>
> >> . . . they make ram and the really good stuf gets rated at 133 and the
> >less
> >> great stuf gets rated at 100.  Initially pc-100 ram was really high
> >quality
> >> pc-66 ram.  . . .
> >>
> >
> >That's how they get the faster CPU's too.
>
> Jesus saves,
> Allah forgives,
> Chthulu thinks you'd make a nice sandwich.
>
>
>


Reply via email to