You guys go right ahead.  This kind of conversation is
on eof my favorite parts of this list.  I would say to
just add OT to both sides of the subject line and keep
on goin'.


Dacia
--- John Rye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Larry Marshall wrote:
> > 
> > I've seen reference to Midnight Commander but
> haven't tracked it
> > down.  It sounds like it would serve as an
> intermediate between a GUI
> > filewindow and doing a whole lot of cd-ing.
> 
> Just type 'mc' at your terminal prompt - it should
> be part of the
> standard install. It's almost exactly like the Dos
> equiv. - a few 
> shortcuts have been implemented differently - but it
> sure makes
> navigation easy.
>  
> > > As for your two neurons - do you walk on yours??
> Like me ??
> > I'll have to give that a try.
> 
> It's fun when you leave your props behind <grin>
>  
> > > I've recently returned to ?nix after being
> burned on four occassions by
> > > confusion still arises - hence my re-install
> count is 29 !!!! since
> > > April!!
> > 
> > I'm really new back to Unix myself.  Have also
> done a bunch of
> > installs, taking a look at the various
> distributions, looking at
> > what's installed under various conditions, and
> just trying to learn
> > how Linux works.
> 
> I've only looked at Mandrake, I brought a copy of
> the Macmillan 6.5
> package while in MA and NH in December, liked what I
> saw - I've since
> moved to 7.0 - and thinking about the move to 7.1.
>  
> > The motivation for a bunch of this is unclear to
> me.  For instance,
> > they've maintained the "." designation for control
> files for
> > everything except Linux itself.  Maybe my memory
> is poor but it also
> > seems that there is no consistency in the use of
> /usr/bin,
> > /usr/local/bin and other directories of that ilk.
> 
> I'm not ofay with the history of Linux - I suspect
> that Linus
> may have been avoiding copyright issues. Sure
> catches me still but
> less and less
> 
> > Then I get
> > something like Star Office, that comes as a binary
> and it just dumps
> > itself all over the place in the location where
> you point it.   I'm
> > whining but give me a tarball with proper paths
> and standard path
> > designations any day.  Is it my imagination or is
> the Red Hat
> > distribution different from Mandrake in its path
> locations?
> 
> I pulled Star Office from Sun in 7 tarballs way back
> (ver 5.1). I
> do like it even if it takes an age to load up on
> this old beast.
> 
> RedHat/Mandrake paths?? dunno, I assumed that
> because L-M was a
> sub/super set of RH that they'd be pretty much the
> same - Bit
> like the difference between say a Holden Commodore
> and a Chevvy
> Lumina - labels and trim... and both modeled off an
> Opel !!!
> 
> > > Environment" by Kerningham and Pike, which I
> think I aquired at my first
> > > System Admin course way back in the early 80's.
> > 
> > You were into Unix before I was.  I first started
> working with Unix
> > when I put a Sparcstation on my desk to develop
> for forest service
> > clients.  Quite a shock as I'd never done any
> multi-user OS stuff and
> > the 20+ volumes of documentation that came with
> the machine seemed a
> > sea of "stuff."  I chuckle when I see people here
> trying to do Linux
> > without advanced reading :-)
> 
> Boy, do I remember those days -
> sigh...............................
>  
> > Since you've got a long history with Unix and have
> been into Linux
> > longer than I, maybe you can advise regarding some
> of the graphics
> > toolsets and which I should concentrate on.  I did
> a bunch of work
> > with tcl/tk way back when but there was no QT then
> and Perl was just
> > beginning to be developed so I never had to
> interface Perl with any of
> > it.
> > Should I want to or is writing vanilla C++ with
> one of the graphics
> > packages the way to go?  Should I spend my time
> learning QT or just
> > bring myself up to speed with current versions of
> tcl/tk?  So much to
> > learn.
> 
> Problem here is that I don't think I'm qualified any
> longer to venture
> an opinion where programming languages are concerned
> - too long away.
> 
> I guess the only opinion/comment I would make in
> this area is that
> programming in whatever language is a young
> persons'domain for the
> most part. I think many of us oldies are too set in
> our ways to
> make the mental shifts.
> 
> I look at some of the code here and go to the fridge
> for a beer after
> 5 minutes just to stop the headhurt!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> 
> Comment - We must be about due for a flame here -
> something about
> wasting bandwidth on reminiscing.
> 
> Cheers
> 
> -- 
> ICQ# 89345394     Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere!
http://mail.yahoo.com/

Reply via email to