YESYESYES I agree! Kathleen Mark Weaver wrote: > naaaaaaah...it's just a real pain to use till you get used to it. Vi is > much easier to learn than emacs. IMHO of course. > > -- > Mark > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > ** =/\= No Penguins were harmed | ICQ#27816299 > ** <_||_> in the making of this | > ** =\/= message... | Registered Linux user #182496 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > On Sat, 9 Sep 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > thought emac was for mac comps, maybe i read to much into names > > > >
- Re: [newbie] last one to be answered :( Eugene C. Zesch
- Re: [newbie] last one to be answered :( Mwinold
- Re: [newbie] last one to be answered :( Larry Marshall
- Re: [newbie] last one to be answered :( Mark Weaver
- Re: [newbie] last one to be answered :( Mark Weaver
- Re: [newbie] last one to be answered :( Kathleen Dickason
- Re: [newbie] last one to be answered :( Paul
- RE: [newbie] last one to be answere... Mike & Tracy Holt
- [newbie] battle stations, batt... patrick
- Re: [newbie] battle statio... Steve Weltman
- RE: [newbie] last one to be an... Paul
- RE: [newbie] last one to be an... Juha Siltala
- Re: [newbie] last one to b... Mark Weaver
- RE: [newbie] last one to be answered :( Abe
- Re: [newbie] last one to be answered :( Kathleen Dickason
- Re: [newbie] last one to be answered :( Mwinold
