dwyatt wrote:

> LOL!!!!!  A message group on the Internet without flaming?  Such a thing
> does not exist my friend.  :)

Just for the record, we're on a mailing list, not a Usenet group...and I would
hope such a thing would exist.

> And in all actuality I didn't read a single intentional flame in the whole
> thread.  The first guy just misunderstood (understandable, since the post
> wasn't in the lists' native tounge) the post for spam.  Since then there has
> been not a single flame.

There's been a lot of arguing, though.

I'm going to post something on-topic again one of these days, I am. :/

Kathleen


Reply via email to