dwyatt wrote: > LOL!!!!! A message group on the Internet without flaming? Such a thing > does not exist my friend. :) Just for the record, we're on a mailing list, not a Usenet group...and I would hope such a thing would exist. > And in all actuality I didn't read a single intentional flame in the whole > thread. The first guy just misunderstood (understandable, since the post > wasn't in the lists' native tounge) the post for spam. Since then there has > been not a single flame. There's been a lot of arguing, though. I'm going to post something on-topic again one of these days, I am. :/ Kathleen
- [newbie] Re: [newbie] Solicitar informaci�n Austin L. Denyer
- Re: [newbie] Re: [newbie] Solicitar informaci�n Kathleen Dickason
- [newbie] Re: [newbie] Re: [newbie] Solicitar in... Greg Stewart
- [newbie] Spanish & co. Denis Havlik
- Re: [newbie] Spanish & co. Paul
- Re: [newbie] Spanish & co. Kathleen Dickason
- Re: [newbie] Spanish & co. patrick
- Re: [newbie] Spanish & co. Eugene C. Zesch
- Re: [newbie] Spanish & co. Kathleen Dickason
- Re: [newbie] Spanish & co. Daniel J. Ferris
- Re: [newbie] Spanish & co. Kathleen Dickason
- Re: [newbie] Spanish & co. dwyatt
- Re: [newbie] Spanish & co. Greg Stewart
- Re: [newbie] Spanish & co. Kathleen Dickason
- Re: [newbie] Spanish & co. Larry Marshall
- Re: [newbie] Spanish & co. Greg Stewart
- Re: [newbie] Spanish & co. Roger Pithers
- Re: [newbie] Spanish & co. patrick
- Re: [newbie] Spanish & co. Mark Weaver
- Re: [newbie] Spanish & co. Mark Weaver
- Re: [newbie] Re: [newbie] Re: [newbie] Soli... Mark Weaver
