I have not run seti in Linux yet, but when i run Distributed.net, it runs
much faster in windows than it does linux. Like OGR is just a little faster
in windows, than on linux, but Rc5 is like a million more packets a second
faster in windows. Kinda odd i would of thought the opposite.
markOpoleO
----- Original Message -----
From: "Trevor Reynolds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 06, 2000 3:22 PM
Subject: Re: [newbie] Setiathome
> Hi,
> To speed up seti in Windoze you have to change the setting on the
> screen saver to blank out the screen. I think it's in the advanced
> settings. All that graph drawing the screen saver uses up tons of
> resources.
> Even with that Mandrake 7.0 is about 2 hours quicker (16 vs. 18) per
> unit on my Celeron 333@417 with 96 meg ram.
>
> Trevor
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 12:39:26PM -0500, Dennis Myers wrote:
> >
> > > The AMD K6-2 at 400 Mhz is taking about 15.5 Hrs per work unit, the
AMD
> > > K6-2 333 on windows 98 looks to be about 31 hrs. ? Don't understand
> > > that, nothing else is running. Just shows that the Penguin is superior
> > > in just one more way. Everything seems to run faster on linux. Search
> > > on,
> >
> > I have noticed the same thing. Seti in Windows on my machine also takes
a lot
> > longer. Literally hours longer, like 18, compared to 12 now.
> >
> > Paul
> >
> > --
> > Q: Why did witches stop flying on brooms?
> > A: Splinters...
> >
> > http://nlpagan.net - ICQ 147208 - Registered Linux User 174403
> > -=PINE 4.21 on Linux Mandrake 7.1=-
>
