> My wife would tell you that when I'm sitting in front of this
> monitor I can't hear with my ears either!  :)

Hell, I'm so blind (and probably deaf, too) my co-workers think the only way
I can see what's on a computer screen is by smelling the damned thing!

--Greg

----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Weaver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


> Definately! I'm all ears...rather I'm all eyes since I can't see with my
> ears. My wife would tell you that when I'm sitting in front of this
> monitor I can't hear with my ears either!  :)
>
> --
> Mark
>
> /* I never worry about the to-jams.
>  * Once I've stuck my foot in my mouth
>  * it's already too late...just make sure
>  * you chew them thoroughly before swallowing!
>  */
>   Registered Linux user #182496
>      *   Pine 4.21   *
>
> On Mon, 16 Oct 2000 7:00am ,John Rye spake passionately in a message:
>
> > Greg Stewart wrote:
> > >
> > > Portsentry usually adds the offending host IP to the route tables, but
this
> > > isn't always the best option anymore. you can change the KILL_ROUTE
command
> > > in /usr/local/psionic/portsentry/portsentry.conf to the following and
it
> > > will add the host IP to your ipchains rules (if you're using
> > > ipchains--which, really, you should be):
> > >
> > > KILL_ROUTE="/sbin/ipchains -I input -s $TARGET$ -j DENY"
> > >
> > > If you still want these probes logged, add "-l" (lower-case "L") to
the line
> > > before the last quotation mark.With this rule added to your ipchains,
all
> > > hits from that host will be dropped regardless of type.
> > >
> > > Hopefully portsentry is not the only protection you have against
intruders.
> > > It's a great utility, but not complete enough on it's own to rely on.
> > >
> >
> > I'm well protected.. using ipchains, I already have your suggestion
> > setup.
> >
> > It was more a question of whether one should attempt to 'deal to' the
> > offender.
> >
> > I used to be continually probed when I used ICQ and Jammer on that
> > other opsys, and had some good results by attacking the source-site
> > owner, but those were not of this type.
> >
> > ?? What/why would a socks proxy port port be probed ??
> >
> > Suggestions and further discussion might be useful to other list
> > members.
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> >
>
>

 
______________________________________________________________________________
Vous avez un site perso ?
2 millions de francs � gagner sur i(france) !
Webmasters : ZE CONCOURS ! http://www.ifrance.com/_reloc/concours.emailif



Reply via email to