Mark Weaver wrote:
> 
> Larry...John...Lonny and others,
> 
> I've done it! I managed to get Linux-2.4-test9 to compile and work! It's
> running at the moment and it took a few times round and round to get
> TCP/IP and PPP to work, but by God it's working. Now I'm curious to see if
> I can get this Turtle Beach sound card working on here which was the
> original reason I started on this adventure in the first place.
> 
> --
> Mark
> 
> /*      I never worry about the to-jams.
>  *      Once I've stuck my foot in my mouth
>  *      it's already too late...just make sure
>  *      you chew them thoroughly before swallowing!
>  */
>         Registered Linux user #182496
>              *   Pine 4.21   *
> 
> On Thu, 19 Oct 2000 1:37pm ,John Rye spake passionately in a message:
> 
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >
> > > >Is there a compilable kernel anywhere on this planet that will not bail
> > > >on your with a ridiculous error making it impossible to update or
> > > >recompile your kernel in any manner? Below is the result  of my latest
> > > >attempt to configure and compile a linux kernel. This one is
> > > >2.4.0-test9. Frankly I'm beginning to think its a lost stinkin cause.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >sincerely fed up and frustrated,
> > > >
> > > >Mark
> > >
> > > Ummm....ok first you are going to have to do some digging to find out what
> > > you need for the header/include files you are missing OR if you have them
> > > ... check to see where the current tree (for the compile) is looking for
> > > them.  Can you send the output from a find / -name errno.h  none of what
> > > you have posted is *post* compilation and it looks like it couldn't create
> > > the .o files to link in in order to continue.  Compiling isn't always as
> > > easy as "./configure, make, make install"  ;-)  or make make bzImage make
> > > dep make modules etc etc,  trouble shoot this first by figuring out where
> > > the missing includes are or if you have them "usr/include/bits/errno.h:25:
> > > linux/errno.h: No such file or directory" (you may have to look in the
> > > Makefile(s) to see what the root dir is in order to find out "where" it
> > > thinks linux/errno.h is or what linux actually is pointing to ... its
> > > usually a sym link to the CURRENT kernel source .... ls -l   should be
> > > pretty easy to work from there =o)
> > >
> > > -Lonny
> > >
> > > +++++++++++++
> > >
> > > In file included from /usr/include/errno.h:36,
> > >                  from scripts/split-include.c:26:
> > > /usr/include/bits/errno.h:25: linux/errno.h: No such file or directory
> > <snip>
> >
> > Did you download the matching kernal-headers?
> >
> > I had something similar when I attempted my first kernal compile
> > on 2.2.16 from a tarball.
> >
> > Cheers
> >

Did you establish what the problem was? Something missing? Malformed?

-- 
ICQ# 89345394     Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"The number of UNIX installations has grown to 10, with more expected"
(The UNIX Programmer's Manual, 2nd Edition, June 1972.)


Reply via email to