And whenever a good enough change comes along, I will buy it thus supporting 
the Mandrake infrastructure.  I'm not into this "new version every 6 months" 
thing, but when there is fundamental improvement (functionality or reduction 
of (install) problems, etc.) I will vote my approval with money.  
    There are disadvantages to being too quick.  XFree 4.0 bombed on my 
system, and shortly thereafter 4.0.1 came out fixing some problems.  I know 
that this is a continuous process, but I wonder if Mandrake is sometimes too 
cutting edge.  The "bathtub curve" is a functional reality.  And the pioneers 
are the ones with the arrows in their backs.  Dumb cliches that echo a basic 
truth.  
      -Gary-
In a message dated 10/26/2000 9:08:39 AM Eastern Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< <snip>
 >      I'd also like to point out just how hard the Mandrake 
 > developers work to keep Mandrake the most up to date distro.  As 
 > evidenced by the speed with which they got the kde 2.0 rpms out, and 
 > that they're workin hard thru the night to tweak and upgrade them, 
 > I'm sure the 7.2 final in a few days will be the biggest jump in 
 > performance and 'slickness', any distro has seen in some time. It's 
 > a shame they don't make any money off of cheap CD's or downloads.
 > I'll prob'ly get the final 7.2 Cd's from lsl.com or cheapbytes, but 
 > i've made up my mind to send Mandrake a donation.  They ought'a sell 
 > the cheap CD's themselves.  I'd buy from them even if they wanted 
 > twice+ what cheapbytes/lsl wants.
 > -- 
 > Tom Brinkman        [EMAIL PROTECTED]         Galveston Bay
 <Snip> 
  
 I would have to agree hole heartedly on the last point.  I have tried almost 
every flavor that I can think of....  including FreeBSD, Red Hat, Corel, and 
Caldera and I would have to say that this is by far the best kept package for 
installation support and just all around functionality that there is our 
there!  I applaud the Mandrake crew and everyone on this list for there 
outstanding efforts.
 
 
 
 Regards
 
 
 Mike Freeman
  >>

Reply via email to