Tom Brinkman wrote:
> 
> On Monday 27 November 2000 10:14 pm, Tom Brinkman wrote:
> > On Monday 27 November 2000 02:39 am, Romanator wrote:
> > > Hi everybody,
> > >
> > > I have 7.2 installed. I am looking for a stable kdevelop to
> > > install. I think it's 1.1 or 1.2. Does anyone know the exact files
> > > need to install the entire development package.
> > >
> > > Any help would be appreciated.
> 
>      End of the road for me :(  Chris' KDE2.01 (20001120) is as far as
> I'm going, Kdevelop is still broken. All the KDE2.1 rpm's I d/l'd (see
> my post below) failed on dependencies.  Mainly libstdc++ 2.96.  From
> the Linux FAQ:
> ~~~~~~~~~~
> It's probably better to use one of the standard GCC releases. The Free
> Software Foundation says that kgcc, a.k.a. GCC 2.96, contains
> extensions that produce object code which is not compatible with
> previous versions of GCC, in addition to the normal bugs found in
> development software. The FSF changed the version number of their
> current development compiler to 2.97 to distinguish them. The FSF's
> statement is at http://www.fsf.org/gcc/gcc-2.96.html. The latest stable
> GCC release is 2.95.2.
> ~~~~~~~~~
>    See:  http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/gcc-2.96.html   (the link in
> the FAQ is broken)
> >
> >      Kdevelop is one of the many KDE1 programs that wasn't ready for
> > KDE2. There's been several updates to KDE2 culminating in KDE2.1,
> > which is now on cooker mirrors. As of 11/20 CVS, Kdevelop (2.0) would
> > either crash on start, or if it manged to start was unusable.
> >     I've been updating KDE2 with successive upgrades, and I'm d/l'g
> > 2.1 (20001123) at the moment.  I doubt if Kdevelop will yet be stable
> > enough for productive use, but the rest of KDE2.1 is a lot slicker
> > and quicker.  I'll let you know tomorrow, all the mirrors are very
> > slow ;)
> 
> --
> Tom Brinkman       [EMAIL PROTECTED]     Galveston Bay

Sounds like it's better to wait a bit. I'm concerned about downloading
it to 7.2.
I'm not sure if it will coexist with KDE2. Any thoughts?

-- 
Roman
Registered Linux User #179293

Reply via email to