Jay!
I like your sig lines. :)
Mark
Jay wrote:
> Roger Sherman wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 5 Dec 2000, Jay wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>> Without sounding too harsh...What the hell is a registered Linux User
>>>>> anyway?
>>>>
>>>> A linux user who is registered.
>>>
>>> Obviously, but where does one go to be a r.l.u.?
>>
>> http://counter.li.org/
>>
>> But why would you care if it seems so bourgouis?
>>
>>
>>>>> And does anybody really care about that?
>>>>
>>>> If one had taste and class, perhaps...
>>>
>>> I wouldn't call it a matter of taste and class.
>>
>> Oh for christs sake...next time I wont forget the smiley.
>>
>>
>>> Maybe to you it is,
>>
>> but
>>
>>> most people could care less what a r.l.u. is. I don't...as long as you
>>> use Linux, who cares if you are registered. That sounds so much like
>>> control to me. Registration = Control. Food for thought.
>>
>> You, my friend, are too tightly wrapped. I have it in my sig because it
>> amuses me, nothing more, nothing less. I registered myself, and my
>> machine, for the purpose of helping to put a concrete number on the amount
>> of linux users there are. Lighten up. Go have a donut, think about a hot
>> chick for a minute, play pacman, do whatever it is you do to
>> relax. LOL...registration is control. Who was I trying to control with my
>> sig file? Other than those with the pavlovian urge to bust balls over a
>> sig file...
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> peace,
>>
>> Rog
>>
>> http://www.slammingrooves.com
>> Registered Linux user #190719
>
>
> I am pretty tightly wound, aren't I? I realize that you meant this as
> sarcasm, but you got to realize that sarcasm is different on "paper". I
> am a VERY sarcastic person, but sarcasm only really works via the spoken
> word.
>
> I remember once on this list when a Brit busted me over my sig. So I
> know how you feel, my apologies. Let's shake and make up...or we can
> fight to the death :)
