Holly said the below: BTW, for the person in the thread who had the very large swap space -- 2GB I think? I'm not deep enough into Linux to say for sure, but even in the Windoze world there was a point at which increasing swap space actually brought a negative return. I wonder if you sized that down to 128MB or less if you might actually see BETTER performance? Again, I can't say with anything vaguely resembling authority, but it does seem like things aren't configured well if you're really using up that much swap. i think she is very right about this. but don't know exactly for linux, but for win there is a point where it bites you in the butt. Adrian Smith 'de telepone dude Telecom Dept. x 7042 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
