>there is no better my friend. they are, in essence, the
>same. the commands, the programs, the security, everything.
>essentially the same. the only baddie i keep seeing in
>RedHat is they mess up the compiler a lot. so, unless
>you're developing a lot, that won't matter.
Actually, the security is not the same, although this largely depends on
what security level you select (customizable after install, I believe)--if
you select "medium" security, you are 100% locked out of the box except
going in on the console by default. With redhat, you don't have the option
to select a security level--it basically leaves itself totally wide open to
attack.
>
>linux is linux is linux...no matter if it's slack, redhat,
>mandrake, whatever. i'd go with either. linuxbusca runs on
>mandrake and debian...and while it's nothing pretty to look
>at yet, mandrake does the email, web server, and DSL
>gateway. pretty awesome.
>
>just my two cents.
>
>--
>
>+-----
>+ Jeffrey M. Reed
>+ Linux System Administrator
>+ Metro West Boston Linux User Group
>+ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>+ (508)792-6070
>+-----
>
