ok, firstly, Mandrake is fine for both server and workstation...

secondly, if you have the hard disk space,, install everything now,, thats
my advice...

and as soon as you get it installed and setup, go to the console or an xterm
and run ntsysv (or one of the other methods of selecting services at
startup, and disable everything you will not be using... ie all the server
stuff...

Then go and edit inetd or xinetd and disable the services you won't be using
in there...
ie pop3, telnet, ftp etc....


Then you will have workstation functionality with a very easy step to
running server services...
(an added benefit is that when you run software update, you can update all
the server stuff in preparation for when you will be running it as a server,
rather then loading all the stuff and updates later...)

On the other hand,, if hard drive space is an issue, you can always add
things in later..

Does that make sense??


regards

Frank

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ted Shaw
Sent: Sunday, 13 May 2001 10:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [newbie] Which distribution to use as server?


G'day -

I'm just beginning the steep trek to using Linux so please forgive the naive
questions. I'd like to use Linux both as a workstation and as a server for
my home system. I'm especially keen to learn to use Apache/php/MySQL for web
page development. As an old windoze user I've got a lot to learn - I've
ordered several books but before ordering any software I thought I'd ask:

1. Is Mandrake-Linux the best distribution for use as a server?
2. Would it be best to start off installing Mandrake-Linux as a workstation
and then later install the applications necessary to turn it into a server
or would it be better to install everything at the beginning?

Having just recently subscribed to the list, I'm impressed with the quality
of the assistance and the manner in which its given. The discussion
regarding LM 7.2 vs LM 8.0 has been especially useful.

Any advice greatly appreciated.

Ted






Reply via email to