And...you have what relation to this list as far as the list servers go as well as the list admin? -- Mark ***** "what knowledge I have managed to accumlate over the years at times becomes obscured and even hidden amidst the vast emotional onslaught of my children. You never finish being a parent. :)" On Sat, 26 May 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Mark> At any rate it would be very helpful and cut down on a lot of > Mark> extra traffic if you would please add a reply-to header to the > Mark> message headers. It's been missing for quite some time now and > Mark> while I can't speak for others, for myself and Pine it would be > Mark> REAL nice not to have to "remove" all the other address when all I > Mark> really want to do is reply to the list and not to the author's > Mark> home address and however many others were copied on the message. > > As I've explained in other messages, it's generally a bad idea for mailing > list managers to replace or insert Reply-To: headers in the mail they > forward along. While it may seem to be a convenience to have it, you *will* > regret it the first time you accidentally send a message to the list that is > intended just for the person whose message you are replying to. If Pine > doesn't allow you to easily edit headers, get a mail user agent that works > well with editors like Emacs or vi. I happen to use VM, a standard package > bundled with Emacs and XEmacs, but I'm sure there are others that provide > similar features. > >
