|
Comes from "Registered users"...
As an experienced Mac-user, it took me months
to become skeptic about OS-evangelism. The first Macintosh (1984) was designed
to be silent, small and discrete. The computer for everyone tried not to look
nor behave like a traditional computer. It was intended to be another domestic
appliance, like a food mixer or a vacuum cleaner, to help with everyday tasks
("the power to be your best"). Then someone
thought they would earn more money (it's always about that) selling a myth
instead of a very good computer, and there you
got the apples: 9% of the whole market.
As a Linux observer, I am suspicious I'm in front
of another "fashionable" operating system. Suddenly, 3 or 4 Linux-only magazines
appear at my newsagent's, and every Windows magazine will open a Linux
section.
It's not that I don't like the idea. The theory and
practise of free software is great. But Linux is not ready yet for the
vast amount of users. How many of us have dual-booting machines? Take a look at
this mailing list. There's simply a lot of things you can't get from Linux
in a Windows-dominated world. We all love spending our spare time with
computers. But that's not the real world (yet). We cannot spend hours at the
office just wondering why my LaserJet won't work or where the CD-ROM
is.
I would encourage developers to follow the way, but
do not sell Tux as a SOHO alternative yet because you will only get frustrated
users willing to pay for their systems to work.
Who cares how many Linux users? You will find many
more Macintoshes involved in profitable tasks and they still don't get the
industry support they deserve. Try not to think how it should be but how it
is.
-- Pablo Garc�a Dur�n |
- Fwd: Re: [newbie] Penguin Paranoia Pablo Garc�a Dur�n
- Fwd: Re: [newbie] Penguin Paranoia Dennis Myers
- FW: Re: Fwd: Re: [newbie] Penguin Paranoia Charles A Edwards
