Yes, FreeBSD does use different licenses. Most BSD licenses do. They run off
a BSD license and is much different then GPL.
Meanwhile, the fact that Micro$HAFT has to rely on a *nix machine period is a
victory for OpenSource period!
tdh
--
T. Holmes
-----------------
UNIXTECHS.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----------------
"Real Men Us Vi!"
Uptime:
--------------------------------------------------------------------
8:36AM up 6 days, 22:28, 7 users, load averages: 0.01, 0.02, 0.00
--------------------------------------------------------------------
| er, i don't wish to be pedantic but i believe that hotmail is using some
| freebsd installations which i believe (could be misinformed) have different
| licence situation than linux? i don't think linux should claim ground that
| isn't strictly it's own, i wouldn't have thought that this would serve 'the
| cause'
|
| flame me if i'm wrong :-)
| bascule
|
|
| haveOn Tuesday 26 June 2001 9:00 pm, you wrote:
| > Edward Barrow wrote:
| > > It was also built and runs on Linux (MS are embarrassed by this and plan
| > > to migrate it to W2K, I don't know if they've done so yet)
| >
| > It will probably stop working when they do.
|
------------------------------------------------------------------
