thanks for the links Sridhar.
I have developed an strategy: I look for a page that has a design similar to
mine and looks well in all browsers. If you have a spare time, take a look
at
www.imaclinux.net
it has a design similar to mine. It looks the same in all Linux browsers
except Mozilla- this leaves the right-most link at the title bar out of the
page. :-(
-----Mensagem Original-----
De: "Sridhar Dhanapalan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Para: "Jeferson Lopes Zacco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Enviada em: segunda-feira, 30 de julho de 2001 00:49
Assunto: Re: [newbie] HTML differences in Konqueror, Mozilla, Nautilus,
Netscape, etc
> On Mon, 30 Jul 2001 08:21, Jeferson Lopes Zacco wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I was making a webpage to tell all reallll newwwbies (TM) like me
how
> > to get sound going on with Quake3 ( should someone be interested- I
doubt
> > it- mail me) when I went to check how did the page looked when viewed
from
> > Linux browsers (I'll explain: even though I managed to configure my
> > winmodem under LM8 it looks like my ISP won't support Linux boxes
> > connecting to it. Sad. So I'm stuck with window$ and exploder for
> > internet.). I usually write HTML with a text-editor, so I'm sure there's
no
> > fancy Exploder only code in my pages.
> >
> > Oddly enough, all browsers managed to make my page look somewhat
> > different. Even Mozilla and Netscape, which I though were close
relatives,
> > behave totally different about tables, width and bgcolor (in a
table/tr/td
> > tag.). Konqueror was the most annoying, it made two of my tables
overlap.
> > Is there a way to make sure my page looks good across all browsers?
> > other than making it a PDF file? As I said I don't use any particular
code
> > /tag, all I use is pretty standart ( or so I hope), but if a browser
cannot
> > handle things such a s a bgcolor for a table then it might rend my page
> > unreadable.
> >
> > TIA
> > --Jeferson L. Zacco aka Wooky
>
> Try these:
>
> http://www.anybrowser.org/campaign/
> http://www.delorie.com/web/wpbcv.html
>
> The best way to ensure compatibility, IMHO, is to make your page 100%
> standards-compliant. The W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) offer a HTML
> Validation Service (http://validator.w3.org/) and a CSS Validation Service
> (http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/). I often make pages using an editor
> like Quanta+ (or even StarOffice). I then open the page in Amaya
> (http://www.w3.org/Amaya/) and make sure that it is standards-compliant
> before saving it. Amaya, being a W3C project, is designed to output 100%
> standards-compliant code. If the page looks fine in Amaya, then it should
> pass the W3C Validation Service tests.
>
> --
> Sridhar Dhanapalan.
> "There are two major products that come from Berkeley:
> LSD and UNIX. We don't believe this to be a coincidence."
> -- Jeremy S. Anderson
