> Ummm, well actually there is a separate flag for the Athlon optimisations., > and they should not necessarily be counted with the i686. > > One list member compiled extensive for 686 a while ago and her results were > disappointing. In general the binaries were slower on a 686 than their 586 > equivalents. > > Athlon, on the other hand does show some increased efficiency. Expect that > when gcc 3.x is out, there may be some larger benefits available for both > processors. > > Civileme Is there a specific flag that I can use now to optimize on an athlon with gcc-2.96-0.58 ? rpm -bb --target=?? test.spec
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://wwww.mandrakestore.com
