If CMYK is the only (?) drawback to GIMP, How hard can it be to implement? E.g. if you have an RGB bitmap, how easily could it be transformed into a CMYK bitmap (or bitmaps for each of the colours)? (Is it true that there are some patent/rights tied up with CMYK and printing these?) Cheers, Rod. (Must be a dumb question or else it would already be implemented, right?) At 20:24 19/09/2001 -0500, Matt Greer wrote: >On Wednesday 19 September 2001 20:04, you wrote: > > Hi, > > > > For the internet, stick with RGB; most browsers don't support displaying > > CMYK images (correctly or at all). Also, most browsers support a very > > limited colour palette, so even though RGB covers a smaller portion of the > > colour spectrum, it is MORE than adequate for the amount of colours > > supported by browsers. > > >That is incorrect. RGB supports more color than CMYK does, by a rather large >margin. CMYK is generally a poor, but required, color space. > >This page has a good breakdown of the two gamuts, and the differences between >additive and subtractive color. > >http://web.wi.mit.edu/graphics/pub/photoshop/colman.htm > >Matt > >Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? >Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
