Sridhar Dhanapalan wrote:
>
> I think that Red Hat had a very valid reason _not_ to include ReiserFS. You must
> remember that Red Hat is a server distro that prizes security and reliability
Hi! Just as an observation, while on the Linux Lunacy trip, I got a chance to
hear Michael Johnson of Redhat speak. He was asked by a software engineer from
Brussels why not ReiserFS. Michael made comments to the effect of what you
just said.
However, to be fair, didn't ext3 fail Civileme's sledgehammer hardware test?
So...I guess there are valid concerns both ways. Once the ReiserFS gets a
little maturity, do you think it will stack up better serverwise, against the
ext3 fs?
Later! ;-)
--
/\
Dark><Lord
\/
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
