On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, Diego [iso-8859-1] Garc�a wrote: > There are a lot of tolls for hacking, but this list is not one of these:) > > Also, i think taht is very usefull to know about these question to decide what > navigator to use in some sites. May be not all designers think in compability. > > In addition, this type of questions can be more smart than only �how i > configure...? > > Finally, some hackers are better teachers than sysadmins like me. From all we > must learn. > > Hackers. please don�t go ;-) > > Only enemies make you better :-) > > Dr. Gz >
um....what in the world are you talking about? the original thrust of this thread was addressing how some sites are drafted in apps that don't adhere to WC3 html standards and because of that cause rendering problems for people because the html they're coded in isn't up to standard. Netscape, Konqueror, Opera, and Mozilla all conform to the "established" WC3 standards. At present there is only one browser that does not. IE. Of course neither does FrontPage Xpress, or M$ Publishers or any of that ilk. I guess they figure since they "own" the world they don't have to conform, but rather dictate to all just how they're going to "re-program" the web. Kinda like defining the web on their own terms. please don't misunderstand. I'm not bashing MS. I think their web authoring tools SUCK because as a programmer I see that the don't follow accepted standards and after having to edit sites and clean up after people that have coded entire sites using their html bastardizations it's become somewhat of a pet peeve for me. -- daRcmaTTeR ---------- Registered Linux User 182496
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
