> 1. It runs slowly

Particularly, as it gives visual confirmation of files being deleted,
moved, or what have you. In the case of deletes, it'll have to blank
out all the icons representing the deleted file(s) and move other icons
up as it rescans the directory.

> 2. The CL is faster if you know how to use it.

Most definitely. And this particular example is not readily programmable
by Konqueror or any other "gui" directory browser I know of. You can 
facilitate it somewhat by sorting (at least by size) so you don't have to
hunt all over the disk to find files that match the criteria).

> 3. I sometimes end up without the luxury of X... so i like to know how to get 
Indeed. But yuo can use xterm/konsole/what have you as well as Konqueror
in day to day use. Both have advantages. For casual ad hoc file maintenance,
Konqueror is probably easier since all you need do is right click the icon 
usually. But for real work, nothing beats working in the shell, and the
OP's situation shell is going to be a win.  




 




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Reply via email to