Hello Hawkwind, Thanks for the help.
Friday, October 21, 2005, 10:49:03 AM, Hawkwind wrote: H> This is a known problem with kat since kat is still very much in H> beta development. Hmmm.... I'm wondering why a beta is included in a major, and hopefully stable, 2006 release? I love the idea of kat - don't get me wrong - just wondering about the timing. H> This is clearly stated on the Mandrivalinux.com website as well as H> kats home page. Agreed. [I wonder how many people saw this before installing 2006...] H> Mandriva announces it since they actually host kat's website for H> them. Thanks for doing that. A nice thing to do.... H> If you really don't want/need kat, it's best to uninstall it H> completely and wait til it's a bit better put together. I may, but might fiddle with it too. It's a nice idea. H> The kded problem is an all together problem that is seperate from H> the kat problem. I'm confused. (1) I saw 99+% CPU in top, from kded. (2) when kat quits [from within kat], kded 'disappears' from top, and X is now using 99+% CPU. If kat and kded are completely different, why do they seem so intertwined? (3) if I crash kat, neither kded or X seem to use much CPU, for days on end. Again, it looks like they seem to be closely related. Perhaps you could explain why such separate things seem so closely related. -- Thanks, rikona mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
____________________________________________________ Want to buy your Pack or Services from Mandriva? Go to http://store.mandriva.com Join the Club : http://www.mandrivaclub.com ____________________________________________________
