On Wednesday 14 December 2005 2:21 am, Anne Wilson wrote: > On Wednesday 14 Dec 2005 05:39, Eric Huff wrote: > > Direct email shows good: > > > > PGP verify signed message > > gpg: Signature made Tue 13 Dec 2005 04:39:08 PM PST using DSA key > > ID 98E6705C > > gpg: Good signature from "Chris Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" > > gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! > > gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to > > the owner. Primary key fingerprint: 441D 71BC 727D 0B1C EC1F 6B39 > > E372 A7DA 98E6 705C PGP verification success > > > > List email shows bad: > > > > PGP verify signed message > > gpg: Signature made Tue 13 Dec 2005 04:39:08 PM PST using DSA key > > ID 98E6705C > > gpg: BAD signature from "Chris Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" > > PGP verification FAILED > > > > I usually run with this off, though, so i don't know how other > > messages looked. > > This has to be another case of bad configuration. If you send the > message to Newbie, then use Send Again to send the same one to Expert > you will find that the Expert one displays as good and the Newbie one > displays as bad. > > The problem, in my mind, comes down to the fact that the list maintainer > doesn't read Newbie. > > Anne
Anne, your message to the list shows as: Message was signed with unknown key 0x0AF7B7E32F62DB48. The validity of the signature cannot be verified. Status: No public key to verify the signature in yellow of course, mine however, will probably show up as bad, if so, what could be the difference then? -- Chris Registered Linux User 283774 http://counter.li.org 06:04:20 up 10 days, 13:06, 1 user, load average: 0.18, 0.23, 0.19 Mandriva Linux 10.1 Official, kernel 2.6.8.1-12mdk
pgp8ckg0ljtJB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
