On Wednesday 15 February 2006 09:58 pm, you wrote: > On Wednesday 15 February 2006 4:51 pm, you wrote: > > On Wednesday 15 February 2006 04:49 pm, you wrote: > > > On Wednesday 15 February 2006 4:45 pm, you wrote: > > > > On Wednesday 15 February 2006 11:27 am, you wrote: > > > > > Message was signed by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Key ID: > > > > > 0x7F85AAFEB33F0661). > > > > > Warning: The signature is bad. > > > > > > > > > > Will gpg sigs 'ever' show up as good on the newbie list? Didn't > > > > > want to post this to the list as I know its been beaten to death > > > > > there. > > > > > > > > I am not sure what the deal was there, unless it was because I added > > > > a signature at the end of the email. My previous posts showed green > > > > and known. ????? I will put a sig on this and see what you get. > > > > > > > > Dennis M. linux user # 180842 > > > > > > Think you forgot to sign it Dennis :) I've found the 'only' way to get > > > the newbie list to not say the sig is bad is to sign it with Inline > > > Open PGP, anything else and it shows as a bad sig. > > > > Funny, don't know why it did not show the gpg sig. I am using Inline Open > > PGP > > I can't see where the sig makes difference at all. I've found that if I > sign it using OpenPGP/MIME it shows as bad. If I sign it using Inline > OpenPGP it shows up good. Thought the list manangers would have this fixed > by now. Who knows though, they, like many it seems are bailing out from > Mandrake/Mandirva. They may have left and the list is running on > autopilot. see how this shows up in the list. Everyone else is coming up "validity is unknown" .
pgpJc2lQYnVvt.pgp
Description: PGP signature
