Rick Collins wrote: > I very much disagree with this idea. Existing maps and images are > not likely to be consistently off by a significant amount.
What makes you assert that? I think it's eminently possible that the orthorectification or alignment of the Yahoo images is out by 10m. 10m is not very far, when you have to figure out exactly where a speeding plane or satellite which took the photos is. They are also much more likely to be *consistently* off within a certain area than they are to be *inconsistently* off. My GPS on the other hand, is an OpenStreetMap recommended model, and I was walking up and down the centre of the roads (not cycling or driving) with a clear view of the sky. Gerv _______________________________________________ newbies mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/newbies
