I'd agree with that. landuse is preferred when you've got enough data to be able to use that instead. Also, you don't need to use landuse=residential where you've used highway=residential, because that's inferred.
Regards, Gregory > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:newbies- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew Williams > Sent: 23 July 2008 15:15 > To: [email protected] > Subject: [OSM-newbies] Abutters / Landuse > > Just got a small question about abutters and landuse. From the > explanation of abutters[1] I gather your only supposed to use the tag > if you can't create a landuse area for the roads your travelling down. > Is this correct? > > For example in Widnes[2] we've got Yahoo coverage so we can work out > landuse from local knowledge and the imagery, so should I be using > abutters or landuse areas? > > -- > Andrew Williams / Nik_Doof > w: http://tensixtyone.com/ > e: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _______________________________________________ > newbies mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/newbies _______________________________________________ newbies mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/newbies
