Actually, a patch was submitted to the mapnik stylesheet within the past day, it'll be visible on the site on Wednesday.
2008/11/3 xeen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Keep using highway=path. It's not possible to show all at once anyway, > so just tag it correctly. Also, Mapnik probably never will display > paths because they are small and generally of low priority. It doesn't > display a /lot/ of stuff, but that doesn't stop anyone from mapping > it, does it? > Just because Mapnik doesn't display something means nothing. Just add > the correct meta data and you'll be fine :) > > Greetings > xeen > > > On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 21:00, Antony Walmsley > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I've been using highway=path to describe some ways I entered. They are just >> public footpaths across muddy fields with no special surfacing such as >> gravel. Just your typical countryside grass covered path across a grass >> covered field. >> >> I've now noticed that these are not showing up on the Mapnik rendering but >> they do show up fine in Osmarender. Here is an example location: >> >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=53.93106&lon=-2.29033&zoom=15&layers=0B00FTF >> >> I see that others are using highway=footway and these do show in Mapnik. >> What should I be using in this situation? I don't want to be forced to >> describe something incorrectly just to make it appear in one particular >> renderer. >> >> Thanks..... >> >> _______________________________________________ >> newbies mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/newbies >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > newbies mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/newbies > -- Regards, Thomas Wood (Edgemaster) _______________________________________________ newbies mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/newbies
