Stefan Monnier wrote: >> an empty comment which you advocate was regarded as the worst of all >> options, defeating the whole point of the change set design. > > It's easy for JOSM to refuse an empty comment. So it's no excuse for > providing the previous comment as a default for the next comment.
You are re-visiting the old discussion: all those points were made and discussed. I wasn't a participant and take no particular view: I have been irritated by having to spend time thinking up a non-banal comment for trivial changes. Sometimes the previous comment is till appropriate or only needs minor adjustment and saves my time. It is time to stop this thread isn't it? If people want to revisit the decisions, then re-open the original thread. ael _______________________________________________ newbies mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/newbies
