Dave Stubbs wrote: > On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 2:10 PM, Dave F. <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Chris Mcnally wrote: >> >>> I'm trying to map a section of road where motor traffic can only travel >>> in one direction, but on one side of the road, sometimes separated by >>> parked cars, is a two lane bike lane for cyclists to travel in either >>> direction. >>> >>> highway = residential >>> oneway = true >>> cycleway = opposite >>> >>> Would this be the correct set of tags for it? From the wiki, it seems >>> that long description for cycleway=opposite covers the lane in both >>> directions for cyclists. The other two cycleway=opposite_lane and >>> opposite_track are less clear to me. Do they imply one way for cyclists >>> as well, but in the opposite way? Or two way for cyclists? >>> >>> If someone could explain this I can updated the wiki perhaps even with a >>> photo. >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Chris M >>> >>> >>> >>> >> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cycleway%3Dopposite_lane >> >> I see opposite_lane as being on the same piece of road surface as the >> highway, but separated with a painted line. >> opposite_track having a more substantial separation such as a kerb, >> bollards or grass verge. >> >> The cases of cycleway = opposite that I've come across in the UK are for >> slow moving residential streets, usually >> cul-de-sacs for motor vehicles but allow an exit for bikes & pedestrians. >> >> > > And the vast majority of these in the UK, if not all of them, are not > one-way streets at all. They're a normal street with a bollard or kerb > or fire-gate with a small section of cycle path, or a small section of > oneway (quite possibly less than a couple of metres, or even just a no > entry sign) with an opposite_lane cycleway to allow bikes in both > directions. > > Dave > > Doesn't that make them cul-de-sacs?
Cheers Dave F. _______________________________________________ newbies mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/newbies
