En/na Randy ha escrit: > Xan wrote: > > >> Hi, >> >> I have a situation where a road is underway in a building. How can I >> mark that? >> This is the situation: >> [http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=39.585385&lon=2.631358&zoom=18&layers=B000FTF] >> You could see the google maps >> [http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&source=s_q&hl=en&geocode=&q=son+dameto,+palma,+mallorca&sll=37.0625,-95.677068&sspn=33.901528,79.013672&ie=UTF8&hq=son+dameto,&hnear=Palma,+Spain&ll=39.585477,2.630716&spn=0.000503,0.001206&t=h&z=20] >> >> that the road is underway a road and then a building (I'm refering to >> the 180 angle). I suppose it has, at the end, a parking. >> >> Thanks, >> Xan. >> > > A new property "covered=yes" has been approved. I just haven't gotten it > into the approved list yet. However, it's primarily for use where layering > isn't appropriate, for example, if the road went straight into the > building, at ground level. In this case, from what I can see, I think > layering would be appropriate. From the satellite view, it's hard to tell, > but from the street view, it looks like the building is at ground level, > and the road descends under the building, so, I'd put the road, at -1. > Since the road has an indefinite end, that is to say, it is probably just > the entrance into underground parking, I personally would not use tunnel. > I *might* add "covered=yes" for additional clarification, but if layering > is appropriate, it shouldn't be necessary. > > Of course, you could take the easy way out, and just stop the road at the > edge of the building, unless you've examined it and have more information. > > Thank you all of you. I think provisionally I take the easiest way out: stop the road at the edge of the building and use layer. When I could examine that, I will refine that.
Xan. _______________________________________________ newbies mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/newbies
